← Back to EventsSource: The Guardian ↗
Times paywall numbers don't add up
Dan Sabbagh has been looking closely at the (alleged) numbers of users reported to have paid for access to The Times and Sunday Times and speculated on what it means in terms of income. His lengthy analysis may be full of guesstimates and some leaps of imagination, but it is interesting all the same. It appears that the numbers do not add up kindly for News International , promoting Sabbagh - a former Times media commentator - to conclude that, thus far, the experiment has not worked. Source: Beehive City
Market Reactions
Price reaction data not yet calculated.
Available after full seed + reaction pipeline runs.
Similar Historical Events(7 found)
Nov 2, 2010Times paywall - who pays what then...
73%Jun 30, 2011Times paywall hits 100,000 but pace of growth slows
72%Jul 19, 2010The Times' paid model: The unofficial numbers come in
71%Jul 29, 2012As the money from Mail Online rolls in, what about those behind the paywall?
71%Nov 25, 2010News Corp Kremlinology: what do the Times paywall numbers mean?
68%Jul 5, 2010Memo to Sunday Times: should you charge for editorial taken from a free website?
66%Mar 8, 2011Advertisers benefit from The Times paywall, claims News International
66%MarketReplay Insight
7 similar events found. Price reaction data will appear here after the reaction pipeline runs.